You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 16, 2019. It is now read-only.
What metrics will the government use to define a well established Bug Bounty SaaS platform besides the size of the pool of researchers in the community that would use the platform?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
TTS intends to make a qualitative determination about whether a vendor is well-established rather than relying primarily on metrics as outlined within RFQ Section 5.0 Evaluation Process.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Question/Comment on TTS Bug Bounty RFQ
Name and affiliation
Brett Kozisek
Director
Synack Inc.
Section of RFQ documents
RFQ Section 2.0 - Background - https://github.com/18F/tts-buy-bug-bounty/blob/master/2018-procurement/RFQ.md#20-background Third paragraph in this section there is a statement that states “a contractor provides a Bug Bounty SaaS platform that can achieve the goals of the TTS while providing the best value to the government must be one that is well-established.”
Question/Comment
What metrics will the government use to define a well established Bug Bounty SaaS platform besides the size of the pool of researchers in the community that would use the platform?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: