Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 16, 2019. It is now read-only.

Background #21

Open
BKozisek7 opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Background #21

BKozisek7 opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@BKozisek7
Copy link

Question/Comment on TTS Bug Bounty RFQ

Name and affiliation

Brett Kozisek
Director
Synack Inc.

Section of RFQ documents

RFQ Section 2.0 - Background - https://github.com/18F/tts-buy-bug-bounty/blob/master/2018-procurement/RFQ.md#20-background Third paragraph in this section there is a statement that states “a contractor provides a Bug Bounty SaaS platform that can achieve the goals of the TTS while providing the best value to the government must be one that is well-established.”

Question/Comment

What metrics will the government use to define a well established Bug Bounty SaaS platform besides the size of the pool of researchers in the community that would use the platform?

@MichelleMcNellis
Copy link
Member

TTS intends to make a qualitative determination about whether a vendor is well-established rather than relying primarily on metrics as outlined within RFQ Section 5.0 Evaluation Process.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants